MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Entrevista com o professor Gilles Dussault: desafios dos sistemas de saúde contemporâneos, por Eleonor Minho Conill, Ligia Giovanella e José-Manuel Freire

2011· article· pt· W2433594677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gilles Dussault

Bibliographic record

VenueCiência & Saúde Coletiva · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gilles Dussault é professor catedrático convidado da Unidade de Saúde Internacional e Bioestatística do Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT), Lisboa, Portugal, desde agosto de 2006. Anteriormente exerceu funções de Senior Health Specialist do Instituto do Banco Mundial, em Washington, D.C. Foi responsável pelas atividades regionais do Programa "Reforma do Sector da Saúde e Financiamento Sustentável", em diversos países de língua oficial francesa, portuguesa e espanhola, nos quais o Banco Mundial se encontrava em atividade. Seu trabalho concentrou-se no financiamento do setor saúde e em políticas de recursos humanos da saúde. Entre 1985 e 2000, assumiu funções como professor e diretor do Departamento de Administração da Saúde da Universidade de Montreal. Tem lecionado em diversos países. No Brasil, foi professor visitante na Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca (1991-92). Suas publicações concentram-se em torno de tópicos relacionados com a regulação e a gestão dos recursos humanos da saúde. Realizou diversos projetos de consultoria para agências de cooperação multilaterais e bilaterais e colabora com comitês editoriais e grupos de trabalho internacionais como a Organização Mundial da Saúde e o Observatório Europeu dos Sistemas e Políticas de Saúde.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0090.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCiência & Saúde ColetivaSame topicHealth, Nursing, Elderly CareFrench-language works237,207