MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2433695251 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1150046

Social equity in health care

2015· letter· en· W2433695251 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Thomas D. Brothers, Matthew J. To, Colin Van Zoost, Jeffrey Turnbull

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Disease Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquity (law)Computer scienceData scienceHealth equityHealth careWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wong and colleagues observe two interesting and unfortunate findings in their study.[1][1] Individuals at higher risk of poor outcomes, including those with more comorbidities, are less likely to receive follow-up care, and those who visited a physician in the preceding year were more likely to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0140.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicChronic Disease Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207