MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2434144862 · doi:10.1177/070674370004500309

The Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors during Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Knowledge

2000· article· en· W2434144862 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Shaila Misri, Demetra Kostaras, Xanthoula Kostaras

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyAnxietyFluoxetineMedicinePsychiatryDepression (economics)Breast feedingPsychologySerotonin reuptake inhibitorSerotonin Uptake InhibitorsLactationReuptake inhibitorPediatricsSerotoninAntidepressantInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article reviews the effects of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class of antidepressants in pregnant and lactating women for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. An examination of the literature was conducted using Medline (1966 to present). Despite methodological concerns and the scarcity of data on this important subject, the majority of recent investigations demonstrate safety of the fetus exposed to SSRIs during pregnancy. All of the SSRIs reported in the studies are excreted into breast milk, and low levels have been found in infant serum. The implications of this for practice include identifying the effects of treatment versus nontreatment on the mother-infant dyad. Further research must examine long-term neurobehavioural teratogenicity in exposed infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry→Same topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum→French-language works237,207→