MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2434364020 · doi:10.2307/20063080

"Don Quijote" and 9-11: The Clash of Civilizations and the Birth of the Modern Novel

2005· article· en· W2434364020 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roberto A. Véguez

Bibliographic record

VenueHispania · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHispanic-African Historical Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The political scientist Samuel P. Huntington's of aptly describes current world events as well as aspects of Don Quijote. In many ways, the conflict between Christianity and Islam defines Spanish history and One can look at the world during Cervantes's lifetime and see how a Muslim presence affected politics, society, and literature. Cervantes's military service, including his participation at Lepanto, and his captivity in Algiers naturally inform his writings. The Argel plays and Don Quijote?most notably, the captive's tale and the figure of Ricote? represent the clash of cultures. As always, Cervantes uses and revises history, so that his vision is both illuminating and distinct. It may sound odd to connect a novel from the seventeenth century with an event that some say marks the beginning of the wars of the twenty-first.1 Yet at least two episodes in Cervantes's Don Quijote and the attacks of 9-11 have in common that they are products of a clash of civilizations, and the 1996 book by that name by Harvard political scientist Samuel P. Huntington offers us the opportunity to search for new meanings in the first modern novel. The thought of finding clues for modern problems in Cervantes's masterpiece is not new, but it has taken a new urgency because of recent developments in European society. Don Quijote takes place in a country that was almost overrun by Muslim armies in 711, but which managed to reverse the results ofthat invasion by 1492. By that time, the three cultures inhabiting the Iberian Peninsula?Christian, Muslim, and Jewish?had become enmeshed in one another, and the rela tionship among the three religions, all peoples of the book, gave Spain historical experiences that were unique among major Western European countries. Recent migration from Muslim countries has created in the continent the kind of situation that Spain faced for most of its medieval and early modern history (Huntington 198-260). It is not surprising, then, to find Europeans turning to Spain's greatest writer for some sort of reference on these matters. In 1994, in Berlin, a collo quium organized by the city's Technical University had as its topic as a cultural melting pot: the encounter of Islam, Judaism and Christianity in the works of Miguel de Cervantes Saa vedra. There were presentations by scholars from France, Spain, Turkey by way of Canada, and Germany. For the organizers of the event, the symposium is a sign of the importance of the ideas and perspectives contained in Cervantes's works in conflictive situations in today's culture. The editors of the proceedings find that Cervantes's thoroughly conscientious and competent handling of the mentality, the moral values, and the forms of representation by non Christian religions, contrasts markedly with the historical ineptitude in present-day Europe in its encounter with differences and cultural otherness (Schmauser 7). The words of the editors would place a heavy burden on any work of fiction, particularly one that is considered the first in the genre. But Don Quijote is no ordinary book. Its context has uncanny similarities to our current situation, as the German editors noticed, and the book itself is a critique of reading, which activity some contend may be the source of the tribulations in which we find ourselves since the wars of religion (as Andrew Sullivan would define them) in which we

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.034
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHispaniaSame topicHispanic-African Historical RelationsFrench-language works237,207