Modification of bamboo fibers/bio‐based epoxy interface by nano‐reinforced coatings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the improvement of the interface between bamboo fibers (BF) and a bio‐based epoxy polymer by coating the surface of BF with nanoparticles. Unidirectional BF bundles were dip‐coated with three different types of coating: bio‐based epoxy, bio‐based epoxy containing silanized silica fume, and bio‐based epoxy containing starch nanoparticles. Scanning electron microscopy and dynamic contact angle tensiometry were performed to characterize the fiber surface. Tensile tests were conducted to study the benefit of the coating on the fiber properties. Bio‐based epoxy/BF composites were molded and both tensile and flexural tests were conducted to study the fiber/matrix interface. Experimental results show that coated BF bundles are more hydrophobic and up to 30% stiffer and resistant than untreated fibers. The nano‐reinforced interface enhances the flexural stress and modulus up to 25% and 20%, respectively, depicting a better fiber/matrix interface. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:1534–1542, 2018. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".