MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2435168889

Dijagnostika i liječenje hiperadrenokorticizma u pasa

2015· dissertation· hr· W2435168889 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josip Fury

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagehr
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Medicine and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndocrine diseaseDiseasePolydipsiaPolyuriaEndocrine systemAdrenocortical hyperfunctionPediatricsInternal medicinePhysiologyEndocrinologyHydrocortisoneHormoneDiabetes mellitus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperadrenocorticism or Cushing's disease is a disease that is caused by prolonged exposure of the body to excessive amounts of cortisol secretion. Therefore, a lack of the normal response exists within the mechanism hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal gland, as well as a lack of the normal rhythm of cortisol secretion. As a disease, hyperadrenocorticism comes in two basic forms; caused by a pituitary disease or by adrenal tumors. Most dogs with hyperadrenocorticism slowly develop clinical symptoms and the owner can notice them only in the more severe form when they develop several clinical symptoms. Polydipsia, polyuria and polyphagia are the most typical symptoms. The disease occurs in dogs older than 6 years. There is a breed predisposition: Poodles, Dachshunds, Beagles, German shepherds, Labrador retrievers and Terriers were most commonly represented among the huge number of breeds. When the basic methods of clinical studies suspect hyperadrenocorticism, the endocrine testing should be completed. There are several different screening tests, but they all give a false positive result, because tests can be positive on some other diseases. Medical therapy may be selected depending on the type of hyperadrenocorticism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207