MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2435394786 · doi:10.1385/1-59259-259-7:75

Analysis of DNA Knots and Catenanes by Agarose-Gel Electrophoresis

2003· article· en· W2435394786 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stephen D. Levene, Hua Tsen

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsCatenationCatenaneAgaroseDNA supercoilAgarose gel electrophoresisDNATopoisomeraseElectrophoresisCircular DNAChemistryBiophysicsBiologyDNA replicationMoleculeBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supercoiling, knotting, and catenation are three common higher-order structures involving coiling of the axis of double-stranded DNA. These forms appear as a result of a number of important biological activities, including topoisomerase action, DNA replication, and genetic recombination (-). All of these species have mobilities in agarose gels that are distinct from those of normal open circular and linear DNA molecules of the same size. The electrophoretic properties of linking number topoisomers are dealt with elsewhere in this volume; this chapter focuses on the separation and characterization of mixtures of knotted or catenated forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207