Color deconvolution. Optimizing handling of 3D unitary optical density vectors with polar coordinates.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Color deconvolution relies on determination of unitary optical density vectors (OD(3D)) derived from pure constituent stains initially defined as intensity vectors in RGB space. OD(3D) can be defined in polar coordinates (phi, theta, radius); always being equal to one, radius can be ignored. Easier handling of unitary optical density 2D vectors (OD(2D)) is shown. STUDY DESIGN: OD(2D) pure stains used in anatomical pathology were assessed as centroid values (phi, theta) with a measure of variance: inertia based on arc lengths between centroid value and sampled points. These variables were plotted on a stereographic projection plane. In order to assess pure stains OD(2D), different methods of sampling RGB pixels were tested and compared: (2) direct sampling of nuclei from preparations using (a) composite H&E and (b) hematoxylin only and (2) for any pure stain RGB image, different associated 8-bit masks (saturation, brightness and RGB average) were used for sampling and compared. Behaviors of phi, theta and inertia were obtained by moving threshold in 8-bit mask histograms. Phi and theta stability were tested against variable light intensity during image acquisition and by using 2 different image acquisition systems. RESULTS: The more saturated RGB pixels are, the more stable phi, theta and inertia values are obtained. Different commercial hematoxylins have distinct OD(2D) characteristics. UltraView DAB stain shows high inertia and is angularly closer to usual counterstains than ultraView Red stain, which also has a lower inertia. Superior accuracy is expected from the latter stain. Phi and theta OD(2D) values are sensitive to light intensity variation, to the used imaging system and to the used objectives. An ImageJ plugin was designed to plot and interactively modify OD(2D) values with instant update of color deconvolution allowing heuristic segmentation. CONCLUSION: Utilization of polar OD(2D) eases statistical characterization of OD(3D) vectors: conditions of optimal sampling were demonstrated and various factors influencing OD(2D) stability were explored. Stereographic projection plane allows intuitive visualization of OD(3D) vectors as well as heuristic vectorial modification. All findings are not restricted to anatomical pathology but can be applied to bright field microscopy and subtractive color applications in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".