Review: Noninvasive ventilation reduces mortality in acute respiratory failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TherapeuticsSeptember 1, 2002Review: Noninvasive ventilation reduces mortality in acute respiratory failureTasnim Sinuff, MDTasnim Sinuff, MDMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (T.S.)Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-2002-137-2-050 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Source CitationPeter JV, Moran JL, Phillips-Hughes J, Warn D. Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure—a meta-analysis update. Crit Care Med. 2002 Mar;30:555-62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11990914References1 Keenan SP, Kernerman PD, Cook DJ, et al. Effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on mortality in patients admitted with acute respiratory failure: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1685-92. [PMID: 9377883] Google Scholar2 Servillo G, Ughi L, Rossano F, Leone D. Noninvasive mask pressure support ventilation in COPD patients. Intensive Care Med. 1994;50:S54. Google Scholar3 Keenan SP, Powers C, McCormack DG. Noninvasive ventilation in milder COPD exacerbations: an RCT. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001:163:A250. Google Scholar4 Bardi G, Pierotello R, Desideri M, et al. Nasal ventilation in COPD exacerbations: early and late results of a prospective, controlled study. Eur Respir J. 2000;15:98-104. [PMID: 10678628] Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (T.S.) PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails September 1, 2002Volume 137, Issue 2Page: 50KeywordsChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseEdemaInformation storage and retrievalIntubationLungsNoninvasive ventilationPositive pressure ventilationPulmonary diseasesRespiratorsRespiratory failureWeaning ePublished: 9 March 2020 Issue Published: September 1, 2002 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2002 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".