MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2436198461 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2016.195

P.093 Pulsatile tinnitus due to obstruction of transverse sinus by tentorial meningioma

2016· article· en· W2436198461 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
FB Maroun, Robert A. Avery, B Lee, Perry F. Bartlett, N Hache

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTinnitusMeningiomaEtiologySinus (botany)Pulsatile flowNeurosurgeryRadiologySurgeryCardiologyAudiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The etiology and treatment of pulsatile tinnitus is difficult and there are different causes for it. To our knowledge, an obstruction of the transverse sinus due to tentorial meningioma has not been reported. Methods: A 66 year old female presented a year ago with a sudden onset of a hissing sound in her ear which has persisted since. Neurologically she was intact. She was seen by otolaryngology who identified no cause for her tinnitus. A CT scan and MRI showed a tentorial meningioma on the right side with partial obstruction of the transverse sinus with evidence of partial chronic thrombus. Results: Removal of the meningioma with decompression of the transverse sinus resulted in immediate disappearance of the pulsatile tinnitus. Conclusions: This report can be added to the etiology of the difficult entity of pulsatile tinnitus particularly as it relates to its management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207