MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2436327638 · doi:10.1109/chinacom.2015.7497993

Energy efficient spectrum aware clustering for cognitive sensor networks: CogLEACH-C

2015· article· en· W2436327638 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkCluster analysisComputer scienceCognitive radioBase stationNode (physics)Computer networkKey distribution in wireless sensor networksEnergy (signal processing)Sensor nodeChannel (broadcasting)WirelessWireless networkEngineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combining Cognitive radio technology with wireless sensor networks has been introduced in the literature as a solution to the spectrum deficiency problem. Many clustering algorithms have been proposed for wireless sensor networks. However, most of them are not suitable for cognitive sensor networks as they operate on a fixed channel settings. In this work, we propose a low energy spectrum aware clustering algorithm, CogLEACH-C, based on CogLEACH algorithm in order to improve the performance in terms of system lifetime. CogLEACH-C uses not only the number of channels sensed idle by the node but also the node energy level in determining the probability for each node to be a cluster head. Hence, allows the base station to select K cluster heads that are in an optimal position for the nodes in the network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207