[Rapid-eye-movement sleep disorders in Parkinson's disease].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the past 10 years, there has been an increasing interest in the study of rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep in neurodegenerative diseases and more particulary in Parkinson's disease (PD). This interest is justified by the strong association observed between these diseases and REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). In the first section of this paper, a critical review of the literature on the presence of REM sleep disorders in PD is presented. Studies that show an association between PD and RBD are reviewed. Studies that report the presence of other REM sleep disorders in PD (short latency, abnormal length and/or proportion of REM sleep, increasing occurrence of hallucinations) are then discussed. Limitations of the criteria proposed by Rechtschaffen et Kales (1968) for the quantification of REM sleep are also presented. Some authors believe that dopaminergic (DA) agents used in the treatment of PD (levodopa, bromocriptine, pergolide, pramipexole and selegiline) could be a responsable factor for the occurence of REM sleep disorders observed in this disease. The literature concerning the impact of these DA agents on human REM sleep is therefore critically reviewed. It is concluded that DA agents cannot explain on their own the presence of REM sleep disorders in PD. Other causes, among which the disturbance of some neurochemical systems linked to the neuropathological process of the disease, must be considered in order to explain these REM sleep disorders. In the second section of this paper, we present the different pathophysiological hypotheses proposed to explain REM sleep disorders in PD, such as a dysfunction of the cholinergic, noradrenergic, serotonergic, dopaminergic or GABAergic neurons. Emphasis is placed on the role of cholinergic neurons of the pedunculopontine and laterodorsal tegmental nuclei, structures shown to be particularly impaired in PD. Neurophysiological, neuroanatomical and neuropharmacological studies demonstrate that these neurons are strongly implicated in the different REM sleep parameters (muscular atonia, electroencephalographic desynchronisation, ponto-geniculo-occipital spikes). Finally, future research directions are proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".