Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1997, les Éditions gaies et lesbiennes publient Embarquement pour l’amour, inaugurant la première collection de romans sentimentaux dans l’édition française. Plus qu’anecdotique, la revendication d’une littérature sentimentale gay implique deux enjeux. D’une part, ce type de production met en évidence la romance et se distancie du trait “sexuel”, qui continue à servir de point de repère à la définition de l’homosexualité. D’autre part, bien que genre populaire, le roman sentimental est légitimé dans la production éditoriale : il s’agit ainsi de déspécialiser la fiction dite “homosexuelle” afin de l’intégrer dans la littérature générale.Cette étude analyse l’émergence du roman sentimental gay dans l’édition française et montre que, loin de reproduire les structures stéréotypiques du roman sentimental hétérosexuel, le roman étudié déconstruit au contraire ces structures au profit d’un imaginaire du texte dans lequel les deux protagonistes masculins façonnent une relation basée sur l’équité des rôles dans le couple.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".