MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2437892037

A Study of Load Imbalance for Parallel Reservoir Simulation with Multiple Partitioning Strategies

2015· dissertation· en· W2437892037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReservoir simulationComputer scienceParallel computingPetroleum engineeringGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High performance computing is an option to increase reservoir simulation efficiency. However, highly scalable and efficient parallel application is not always easy to obtain from case to case. Load imbalance caused by mesh partitioning and message passing through connections between partitions are the main reasons that prevent successful parallel implementation. This thesis introduces several mesh partitioning methods that assign relatively similar loads to processes and minimize connections between partitions to a large scale parallel reservoir simulation model. Their effects on enhancing parallel computing performance are discussed. Specifically, the effects are evaluated based on two parameters: parallel overhead and load imbalance status.\n\nThe partitioning methods introduced are 2D decomposition, Metis partition, Zoltan partitioning, and spectral partitioning. In the first place, their implementation in the original reservoir model is researched. Then, they are also applied to the same reservoir model with elevated well complexity. In order to increase well complexity, the original model’s well geometry and well control constraints are changed. For each partitioning strategy, various subdomain number s are used. They are 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32. Once the mesh is partitioned, the assignment of each subdomain to process is also studied. The fashion of assigning each subdomain’s reservoir model computation to a specific process in the cluster affects parallel overhead. When two neighboring subdomains are assigned to two physically neighboring processes in the cluster, the overhead is much smaller than when they are assigned to two non-neighboring processes. Except for the assignment process, load imbalance are examined as well. In the original reservoir model, since the well geometries and well control patterns are not very complex, low load imbalance is obtained for parallel simulation based on the four partitioning methods introduced. The speedups are scalable. When the well model complexity is elevated by introducing horizontal wells and more frequent well control constraints changes, an increased load imbalance can be observed in the parallel reservoir simulation. Thus, the scalability is undermined. In general, this work allows us to better understand the application of various partitioning strategies in terms of load imbalance and parallel overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it