The Great White North Encounters September 11: Race, Gender, and Nation in Canada's National Daily, the Globe and Mail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Terror is a feature of the symbolic order, the vast mesh of representations and narratives both official and unofficial public and private, in which a culture works out its sense of itself It affects that dynamic but relatively stable set of implicit parameters that establish a group's sense of the actual and the possible and create a loose but definite sense of collective identity.--Geoffrey Galt Harpham (2002: 573) ********** BY BEGINNING THIS ARTICLE WITH AN EPIGRAPH FROM HARPHAM, MY INTENTION IS to highlight the nexus between the construction of terror and the consolidation of national identity. In the following sections, I argue that Canada's national daily, The Globe and Mail offered a symbolic and discursive universe that reinvented the Other in ways that helped to re-inscribe the nation as a peaceful haven. I contend that such an imaginary has strategic uses in formulating discourses of nationness, reflecting a textured landscape in which race, gender, and nation are interwoven in ways that suggest a unifying and homogeneous national identity. In the first part of the article, I discuss the centrality of the news media as purveyors of hegemonic ideals, and as unifying forces in solidifying a sense of an imagined collective, one based on a shared adherence to national mythologies. In the latter part of the article, I turn to an analysis of the coverage provided by the Globe and Mail, one of the national dailies, in the immediate aftermath of the events of September 11. Exercising an informal textual and discourse analysis of the paper's coverage, I outline the various ways in which race and gender are utilized as tropes by which to secure an image of the Canadian nation as a peaceful haven threatened by Others, whose differences are inflected in raced and gendered ways. I pay particular attention to representations of Muslim women, especially those in Afghanistan. Situating the Print Media in the Canadian Landscape In a nation whose geographic size is enormous and whose population lives on a miniscule percentage of the total land mass, the role of the national media assumes even greater import when considering issues of social cohesion and the construction of an imagined community (Anderson, 1983). The news media are a crucial conduit through which representational discourses about the self and other are communicated (Sreberny, 2002). Getting news to various provinces and territories and incorporating news from each of these localities is a challenge that few nations face. Added to this, regional differences compound the situation by reflecting divergent interests, agendas, and degrees of racial and cultural diversity. Language remains a major source of tension, localized in the popular imagination as stemming from and resulting in two distinct solitudes, the French and the English, both of which are enshrined as the founding or charter groups. Notwithstanding the above, the Canadian landscape is also marked by intense media concentration, wherein news stories (and entertainment media) are provided by a few conglomerates, and where local stories are often refracted through the lens of the monopoly that governs that local subsidiary (Hackett et al., 2000; Winter, 1997; 2002). In terms of print media, three large corporations dominate the scene: Bell Globemedia Inc., CanWest Global Corporation, and Torstar. Within Quebec, Quebecor is a major player in that provincial market, being largely responsible for the production of French language dailies. There are few independent papers; CanWest Global, Bellglobemedia, or Torstar own most of those circulated in the major cities. The two national dailies, The Globe and Mail and the National Post, are owned by Bell Globemedia and CanWest Global, respectively, the two largest corporations. Thus, a paper like The Globe and Mail is simply one of Bell Globemedia Corporation's media outlets, which also owns CTV, a leading private broadcaster, the Discovery Channel, TSN. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".