Writing Contemporary Québec: The Quest for an Intertextual Identity in the Work of Roxanne Bouchard
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the young Québécois author Roxanne Bouchard revealed in a 2010 interview, the search for an ‘identité intertextuelle’ is at the centre of her writing project. In this article, I will begin with a contextualization of the notions of intertextuality and identity within the Canadian francophone and Québécois literary, social and political space. This will be followed by an analysis of two of her novels – Whisky et paraboles (2005) and Nous étions le sel de la mer (2014). I will argue that Bouchard uses the intertextual devices of quotation and plurilingualism to generate space and identity in her novel writing. I will show how Bouchard's first novel gives rise to a tension between the paradigms of survival and rupture, whilst in her latest book she introduces a sociolinguistic dimension to her writing through the immersion of written language in the sounds of Québec's spoken language varieties. I will conclude that Bouchard remains preoccupied with re-writing contemporary rural space in search for a contemporary Québécois cultural identity engaging with orality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.030 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".