MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2439808196 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2016-0060

A mechanistic empirical approach for the evaluation of the structural capacity and remaining service life of flexible pavements at the network level

2016· article· en· W2439808196 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mofreh Saleh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeflection (physics)RutService lifeSubgradeStructural engineeringCurvatureAsphalt pavementUltimate tensile strengthAsphaltEngineeringComputer scienceCivil engineeringGeotechnical engineeringReliability engineeringMaterials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Road asset managers need to utilize reliable indicators for the structural condition and remaining service life at the network level to make rational decisions of the required funding and the optimum strategies for maintenance and rehabilitation. The surface deflection bowls and pavement critical responses were generated by computer simulations for a total of 2880 flexible pavement sections. The normalized area was computed from the deflection bowl data and it was found to be very well correlated with the compressive strain at the top of the subgrade. While the pavement surface curvature and area under pavement profile were highly correlated with the tensile strain at the bottom of the asphalt concrete layer. Thus, these parameters were used to evaluate the remaining service life in rutting and fatigue. Field data showed an excellent match between the trends obtained from the field and computer simulated data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207