MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2440019739 · doi:10.4000/studifrancesi.2606

Claude Corbo (dir.), Monuments intellectuels de la Nouvelle-France et du Québec ancien. Aux origines d’une tradition culturelle

2016· article· fr· W2440019739 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carminella Biondi

Bibliographic record

VenueStudi Francesi · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesAncien regimePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Claude Corbo, ideatore e curatore del volume, non è nuovo ad imprese di questo genere. Aveva, infatti, già pubblicato nel 2006 presso le edizioni Septentrion (Sillery) un volume collettivo intitolato Monuments intellectuels québécois du xx siècle. Come per la precedente raccolta, Corbo ha riunito un gruppo di specialisti, ciascuno dei quali ha presentato un “monumento”, cioè un testo ritenuto fondante della storia culturale del Québec, a partire dal Seicento fino alla fine del xix secolo, seg...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudi FrancesiSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207