Raman Vibrational Shifts of Small Clusters of Hydrogen Isotopologues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Raman vibrational shifts of small parahydrogen (pH2), orthodeuterium (oD2), and paratritium (pT2) clusters with respect to the free molecules are calculated by combining a first order perturbation theory approach with Langevin equation Path Integral Ground State (LePIGS) simulations [ J. Phys. Chem. A 2013 , 117 , 7461 ]. Our theoretical predictions are compared to existing cryogenic free jet expansion results for pure (pH2)N clusters [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004 , 92 , 223401 ] and to new measurements for (oD2)N clusters reported here. This method has been successfully used before to predict the Raman vibrational shifts of (pH2)N clusters [ J. Chem. Phys. 2014 , 141 , 014310 ]. The 6-D interaction potential of Hinde [ J. Chem. Phys. 2008 , 128 , 154308 ] is reduced to 1-D using the Adiabatic Hindered Rotor approximation to yield effective pair potentials for both molecules being in the ground vibrational state, and for one of them carrying one quantum of vibrational excitation. These reduced 1-D potentials are fitted to a Morse Long Range analytic form for later convenience. Good agreement between experiment and theory is found for the smaller clusters, but significant deviations remain for the larger ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".