Raman Vibrational Shifts of Small Clusters of Hydrogen Isotopologues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Raman vibrational shifts of small parahydrogen (pH2), orthodeuterium (oD2), and paratritium (pT2) clusters with respect to the free molecules are calculated by combining a first order perturbation theory approach with Langevin equation Path Integral Ground State (LePIGS) simulations [ J. Phys. Chem. A 2013 , 117 , 7461 ]. Our theoretical predictions are compared to existing cryogenic free jet expansion results for pure (pH2)N clusters [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004 , 92 , 223401 ] and to new measurements for (oD2)N clusters reported here. This method has been successfully used before to predict the Raman vibrational shifts of (pH2)N clusters [ J. Chem. Phys. 2014 , 141 , 014310 ]. The 6-D interaction potential of Hinde [ J. Chem. Phys. 2008 , 128 , 154308 ] is reduced to 1-D using the Adiabatic Hindered Rotor approximation to yield effective pair potentials for both molecules being in the ground vibrational state, and for one of them carrying one quantum of vibrational excitation. These reduced 1-D potentials are fitted to a Morse Long Range analytic form for later convenience. Good agreement between experiment and theory is found for the smaller clusters, but significant deviations remain for the larger ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".