Международно-правовые основы обеспечения коллективной безопасности в Европе
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Warsaw Treaty Organization (Warsaw Pact) disintegration in 1991 made essential changes to the architecture of the European security. New collective security models don’t correspond the present realities and demand the adaptation to the changed system requirements. The institutes of collective security ensuring need to be reformed. Four years ago, on June 5, 2008, Russia initiated to create reliable basis of collective security in euroatlantic region on the legal and international treaty basis. The draft of such contract was developed in November, 2009 and sent to the states of Europe, the USA, Canada, and also to a number of the international organizations of the region, including NATO. The Russian Federation urged the states, and also the international European organizations, including NATO, to create system of collective security in euroatlantic region on the basis of principles of equal and identical security, provide the safety to all the participants of the contract. Present article says about how the affairs with Russia ’s initiative are.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".