Ethnographie, anthropologie et contemporanéité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente une analyse du savoir anthropologique dans le Brésil contemporain à partir de la description des formes particulières de savoir et des styles anthropologiques qui ont construit l’ethnographie et ses objets privilégiés à certains moments historiques dans notre pays. Nous nous référons tout d’abord aux contextes politiques et socioculturels au sein desquels, entre la fin du XIXe siècle et 1930, s’est développée une production qui présente une réflexion sur la construction de la société brésilienne. Ensuite, nous décrivons les processus d’institutionnalisation de l’anthropologie, de 1940 jusqu’à son développement contemporain. Au terme de cet article, nous présentons le problème des rapports institutionnels et des pouvoir sous-jacents au savoir ethnographique, qui configurent ses limites et ses possibilités au Brésil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".