MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2440961037

[Possibilities of medical correction of moderate cognitive impairment].

2013· article· en· W2440961037 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lebedeva Av, И А Щукин, Soldatov Ma, Ismailov Am, Shikhkerimov Rk, Otcheskaia Ov, Khozova Aa

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGinkgo biloba and Cashew Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleAnxietyCognitionDepression (economics)Ginkgo bilobaCognitive impairmentCognitive deficitPsychiatryDoseClinical psychologyAudiologyInternal medicinePharmacology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thirty-four outpatients with moderate cognitive impairment were treated with one of standard extracts of Ginkgo Biloba - EGb761 (memoplant). Memoplant was used in high dosages (240 mg daily) twice a day during three months. Patients were assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the hospital depression scale and QoL questionnaire EQ5d as well as standard neurological and somatic examination. A statistical analysis of data revealed a significant improvement in most measures, mostly in attention, memory, orientation and visual-spatial/ executive functions as well as in anxiety and depression. The drug is well-tolerated and is recommended for practical use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicGinkgo biloba and Cashew ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207