Les puissances émergentes dans la bataille mondiale de l’attraction : Bollywood, vecteur du soft power de l’Inde ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’interroge sur la place de l’industrie cinématographique de l’Inde dans le renforcement de son soft power et sur quelle mesure celle-ci permet à l’Inde de construire un statut de puissance culturelle active. En ce sens, il s’agit d’abord d’analyser les caractéristiques institutionnelles du système cinématographique indien, avant de se pencher sur le rôle de l’Inde au sein du régime international de l’audiovisuel, et enfin de terminer sur la concurrence culturelle mondiale à laquelle l’Inde est confrontée. Il s’avèrera que les structures domestiques sont un facteur majeur en vue de saisir la volonté d’influence de l’Inde sur la scène internationale et sa place dans l’économie audiovisuelle mondiale au sein de laquelle Hollywood dispose encore de capacités de financement sans égal et de stratégies de distribution mondiales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".