Regulation of early embryonic behavior by nitric oxide in the pond snail<i>Helisoma trivolvis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helisoma trivolvis embryos display a cilia-driven rotational behavior that is regulated by a pair of serotonergic neurons named ENC1s. As these cilio-excitatory motor neurons contain an apical dendrite ending in a chemosensory dendritic knob at the embryonic surface, they probably function as sensorimotor neurons. Given that nitric oxide (NO) is often associated with sensory neurons in invertebrates, and has also been implicated in the control of ciliary activity, we examined the expression of NO synthase (NOS) activity and possible function of NO in regulating the rotational behavior in H. trivolvis embryos. NADPH diaphorase histochemistry on stage E25-E30 embryos revealed NOS expression in the protonephridia, buccal mass, dorsolateral ciliary cells and the sensory dendritic knobs of ENC1. At stages E35-40, the pedal ciliary cells and ENC1's soma, apical dendrite and proximal descending axon were also stained. In stage E25 embryos, optimal doses of the NO donors SNAP and SNP increased the rate of embryonic rotation by twofold, in contrast to the fourfold increase caused by 100 micro mol l(-1) serotonin. The NOS inhibitors L-NAME (10 mmol l(-1)) and 7-NI (100 micro mol l(-1)) decreased the rotation rate by approximately 50%, whereas co-addition of L-NAME and SNAP caused a twofold increase. In an analysis of the surge and inter-surge subcomponents of the rotational behavior, the NO donors increased the inter-surge rotation rate and the surge amplitude. In contrast, the NO inhibitors decreased the inter-surge rotation rate and the frequency of surges. These data suggest that the embryonic rotational behavior depends in part on the constitutive excitatory actions of NO on ENC1 and ciliary cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".