Erratum: Water Science and Technology 71 (8), 1241–1248: Long-term performance of side-stream deammonification in a continuous flow granular-activated sludge process for nitrogen removal from high ammonium wastewater, Babak Rezania, Donald S. Mavinic and Harlan G. Kelly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Correction| September 01 2015 Erratum: Water Science and Technology 71 (8), 1241–1248: Long-term performance of side-stream deammonification in a continuous flow granular-activated sludge process for nitrogen removal from high ammonium wastewater, Babak Rezania, Donald S. Mavinic and Harlan G. Kelly Babak Rezania; Babak Rezania 1KNE2 Ltd, Suite 1204, 1281 W. Cordova St, Vancouver, BC, V6C 3R5 Canada Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Donald S. Mavinic; Donald S. Mavinic 1KNE2 Ltd, Suite 1204, 1281 W. Cordova St, Vancouver, BC, V6C 3R5 Canada Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Harlan G. Kelly Harlan G. Kelly 1KNE2 Ltd, Suite 1204, 1281 W. Cordova St, Vancouver, BC, V6C 3R5 Canada Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Water Sci Technol (2015) 72 (5): 835. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.335 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Permissions Search Site Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThis Journal Search Advanced Search Citation Babak Rezania, Donald S. Mavinic, Harlan G. Kelly; Erratum: Water Science and Technology 71 (8), 1241–1248: Long-term performance of side-stream deammonification in a continuous flow granular-activated sludge process for nitrogen removal from high ammonium wastewater, Babak Rezania, Donald S. Mavinic and Harlan G. Kelly. Water Sci Technol 1 September 2015; 72 (5): 835. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.335 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex The publisher regrets that due to an error in production the affiliation of one of the authors was printed incorrectly in the published version. We wish to apologise to the authors and to the readers for any inconvenience caused. The correct affiliation is given below. © IWA Publishing 2015 © IWA Publishing 2015 You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".