MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2442476329 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2016.176

P.072 The spectrotemporal characteristics of NMDA receptor encephalitis

2016· article· en· W2442476329 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Richard, Theodoros P. Zanos, François Dubeau, Etienne de Villers‐Sidani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyMedicineNMDA receptorAnti-NMDA receptor encephalitisEncephalitisDiseaseAntibodySerologyNeuroscienceImmunologyPathologyInternal medicineReceptorPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: NMDA receptor encephalitis (NMDA-RE) is an autoimmune disorder caused by antibodies to the NR1-NR2B heterodimer of the NMDA receptor. Currently, disease status is tracked primarily by the presence of auto-antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum. Using serological and CSF markers along with clinical parameters to track disease progress can be challenging since patient symptoms and disease progress can vary widely. Methods: EEGs were reviewed in a 31 year old male patient with proven NMDA-RE. EEG data were sampled from various times before and after diagnosis, as well as during various stages of treatment. All analyses were performed using Matlab (Mathworks). Results: We showed that using a simple 1/f model of spectral behaviour (Buzsaki and Draguhn, 2004), we could fit the power spectra of the raw data at various instances during routine EEGs. We have demonstrated that the values of specific fitting parameters vary in relationship to the patient’s clinical status across various stages of illness. Conclusions: The aim of this project was to explore the potential utility of EEG as a complement to the usual clinical metrics used in monitoring NMDA-RE. The analysis techniques presented here highlight the use of EEG as a practical, minimaly-invasive tool to monitor progress and potentially aid in clinical decision making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207