MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2442497598 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2016.209

P.108 Diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma secondary to iatrogenic immunosuppression with unusual MRI findings and literature review

2016· article· en· W2442497598 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
AH Naeem, MD Staudt, B Wang, D Lee, Andrew G. Parrent

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImmunosuppressionContext (archaeology)AzathioprineLymphomaDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaRadiologySurgeryPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Immunosuppressive therapy is a risk factor for lymphoproliferative disorders. We present a case of primary CNS B-cell lymphoma in the setting of iatrogenic immunosuppression from azathioprine usage. A literature review is provided. Methods: Case report Results: 64-year-old male presents with several weeks of cognitive decline, impaired speech, and headache with a history of ulcerative colitis (on azathioprine and 5-ASA) with no radiological evidence of systemic malignancy. MR showed left frontal extra-axial mass (4.0 x 2.4 x 4.0 cm) with heterogeneous enhancement of a solid component with local dural thickening. The enhancing mass had solid and cystic components. Radiological differential included dural metastasis, atypical meningioma or unusual intra-axial mass including GBM with some dural involvement. He underwent surgical resection, which showed a primary CNS lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell, CD 20 + and EBV +. Post-operatively his cognition improved. Azathioprine was stopped and 5-ASA was increased. He proceeded with MPVC (methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine) chemotherapy. Conclusions: Our case shows isolated extra-nodal CNS manifestation of lymphoma in the context of immunosuppressive medications with strikingly atypical MR findings leading to a pre-operative diagnostic dilemma. Treatment is challenging and needs to be individually tailored due to a need for stopping immunosuppressive agents in conjunction with CNS lymphoma treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207