MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2442685904 · doi:10.1055/s-2004-817703

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes

2003· review· en· W2442685904 on OpenAlexaff
Graham C. Wong, Robert P. Giugliano

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Vascular Medicine · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous coronary interventionConventional PCIUnstable anginaLow molecular weight heparinInternal medicineCardiologyMyocardial infarctionAntithrombinHeparinConcomitantAcute coronary syndrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) possess several advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Already a class I indication for the treatment of unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI), LMWHs also show promise in the setting of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Moreover, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated equivalent safety of LMWH with concomitant use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Larger clinical studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of LMWH as an antithrombin for the treatment across the spectrum of ACS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Vascular MedicineSame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207