MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2442777258 · doi:10.3968/8504

Coping With Grim Dystopia: A Re-Reading of The Fire-Dwellers

2016· article· en· W2442777258 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Thomas F. Rose, Asha Susan Jacob

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystopiaNarrativeHistoryPostmodernismAestheticsCoping (psychology)ConsciousnessPsychologyLiteratureSociologyPsychoanalysisArtPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian writer Margaret Laurence’s novel The Fire-Dwellers has long been critically dismissed as too paltry and insignificant to warrant in-depth treatment. This paper attempts to identify the novel as a significant one in theme and technique incorporating traits of postmodernism and expresses the need for a deeper critical evaluation of the work. Through the novel, Laurence records the terrors of the 1960s counterculture, one of the most turbulent times in recent history. She portrays the struggle of the individual to cope with the fires of an increasingly violent and insane dystopic world which fragments the self. Laurence, in the novel, develops an innovative narrative technique to recreate the protagonist’s fractured consciousness in the fragmented cultural context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207