MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W244319338

Genetic Structure of Quantitative Characters in Pinzgau of Transilvania Breed from Hateg Region

2011· article· en· W244319338 on OpenAlexaff
Niculita Mang

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreedReproductionFecundityBiologyLactationMilk productionAnimal scienceLongevityPregnancyGeneticsDemographyPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements made on 270 cows of Transilvanian Pinzgau breed from Hunedoara county enables us to establish the genetic structure for productive characters as milk production and reproduction. We found the followings. Transilvanian Pinzgau breed from Hateg county has its own genetic structure but similar to the one raised in region of Bucovina, for characters which concur to milk production for these contributing to reproduction efficiency. The average potential of milk production is 305 days and does not overrun 3550 Kg milk with 130 Kg fat (3,8%)but with a good persistence of milk synthesis during normal lactation. Maximum of milk production is manifested in the 7th lactation and the average longevity overruns 9 lactations. Transilvanian Pinzgau is characterized by a remarkable fecundity and natality, with a low rate of embryonic abortion. Genetic handicap for this breed is its productive tardivnness and reproduction (it can enter reproduction without negative morphologic and functional consequences at the age of 21 months when it realizes 68% of the adult mass).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→