Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recovery in euro area economic activity will continue according to projections. It is anticipated that real GDP will increase by 1, 7% in 2016 and 1, 9% in 2017. The overall prospects are unchanged compared to the previous period, the domestic demand is however more favorable external demand and the less favorable. It is estimated that the recovery of economic activity in the euro area will continue, supported increasingly by domestic demand over the projection horizon. In the third quarter of 2015, real GDP grew by 0, 3%. Looking ahead, on the basis of high levels of consumer confidence and corporate sector in recent months, we anticipate maintaining economic growth in the short term. Subsequently, a number of favorable factors are expected to support real GDP growth over the projection horizon, especially the accommodative monetary policy, a slight fiscal loosening, low prices of oil and gradually improving demand prospects worldwide, combined with the increase in quota the market share held by euro area exports, reflecting the relatively weaker exchange rate of the euro effectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it