MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2444607264 · doi:10.1109/oceansap.2016.7485504

Optimal design of consensus for autonomous underwater vehicles with damping term using a directed spanning tree

2016· article· en· W2444607264 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOCEANS 2016 - Shanghai · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanning treeTerm (time)Control theory (sociology)Heading (navigation)Lyapunov functionComputer scienceUnderwaterTree (set theory)ConsensusMinimum spanning treeFunction (biology)Multi-agent systemTopology (electrical circuits)Network topologyMathematical optimizationMathematicsControl (management)EngineeringAlgorithmArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an optimal design of consensus for multi-agent systems with damping term using a directed spanning tree. Compared with the undirected connected topology, the choice of Lyapunov function can be more complicated. Concerning about the directed spanning tree, the consensus of multi-agent systems is guaranteed by analyzing the eigenstructure of the system matrix. Being different from previous researches, the damping term is taken into consideration and the velocity dynamics is formed. Furthermore, it is derived that the consensus value is related with its parameter. Finally, simulations are carried out with simplified heading control systems of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), which show the effectiveness of the proposed optimal design method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it