Bibliographic record
Abstract
La prise de Jérusalem aux Arabes en 1099 et surtout celle de Constantinople aux Byzantins en 1204 furent pour les croisés l'occasion de s'approprier de nombreuses reliques, qui revinrent bientôt à diverses églises de France, d'Allemagne et d'Italie.Sous un titre un peu trop large, ce livre issu d'une habilitation à l'université de Hambourg étudie les conséquences de ces évènements sur l'évolution de la présentation des reliques dans les reliquaires occidentaux.À Byzance, les reliques étaient fréquemment sorties de leurs coffrets et montrées, mais en Occident avant les croisades, elles n'étaient normalement pas directement visibles : certes, des reliquaires de cristal de roche furent créés dès le XIe siècle, mais le regard portait alors sur les emballages textiles des reliques, et non sur celles-ci directement.Ces distinctions précisent et nuancent le travail de C. L. Diedrichs, Vom Glauben zum Sehen.Die Sichtbarkeit der Reliquie im Reliquiar.Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Sehens, Berlin 2001, qui traitait de la visibilité des reliques sans considérer la perspective orientale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".