Prediction of Host–Guest Na–Fe Intermetallics at High Pressures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High pressure can fundamentally alter the electronic structure of elemental metals, leading to the unexpected formation of intermetallics with unusual structural features. In the present study, the phase stabilities and structural changes of Na-Fe intermetallics under pressure were studied using unbiased structure searching methods, combined with density functional theory calculations. Two intermetallics with stoichiometries Na3Fe and Na4Fe are found to be thermodynamically stable at pressures above 120 and 155 GPa, respectively. An interesting structural feature is that both have form a host-guest-like structure with Na sublattices constructed from small and large polygons similar to the host framework of the self-hosting incommensurate phases observed in Group I and II elements. Apart from the one-dimensional (1D) Fe chains running through the large channels, more interestingly, electrides are found to localize in the small channels between the layers. Electron topological analysis shows secondary bonding interactions between the Fe atoms and the interstitial electrides help to stabilize these structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".