MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An international, population-level initiative to promote healthy lifestyle practices among prostate cancer survivors.

2016· article· en· W2460175761 on OpenAlexaffabout
June M. Chan, Robert U. Newton, S. Nicole Culos‐Reed, S Faithfull, Sylvie Lambert, Stacey A. Kenfield, Erin Van Blarigan, Karen S. Lyons, Justin Ramsdill, Ashley Zahavich, Lindsay R. Duncan, Nicolas H. Hart, Mike Dew, Esther Moe, Cyril Dixon, Kerri M. Winters‐Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTelehealthPopulationQuality of life (healthcare)Psychological interventionGeneral partnershipGerontologyTelemedicineHealth careNursingEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e287 Background: Growing evidence suggests that specific lifestyle practices (e.g., diet and exercise) may delay cancer progression among prostate cancer survivors (PCS) and restore post-treatment quality of life. However, there are limited efforts to translate this knowledge to sustainable behavior change among PCS at a population level. Methods: TrueNTH is an international partnership to develop innovative evidence-based interventions and care models to improve the physical and mental wellbeing of PCS. Within TrueNTH, four countries (U.S.A., Australia, Canada, U.K.) are developing solutions to improve lifestyle practices among PCS. Australia is implementing face-to-face and telehealth delivery of exercise and dietary programs facilitated by a web-based portal. Canada is implementing group-based exercise and yoga programs combined with a web-based portal to deliver exercise, nutrition and stress-reduction resources for PCS and caregivers. The U.K. is implementing a healthy living pharmacy approach to deliver tailored diet and exercise advice and support to men. The U.S. will implement a scalable web-based portal that reaches PCS, providers and partners and provides personalized exercise prescriptions and dietary advice, interactive guidance, and behavioral support via social media, tele-exercise, and face-to-face communities. Results: TrueNTH initiatives are in various phases of a three-year project. Australia has enrolled 30 of 80 men across 2 sites and via telehealth, and demonstrated acceptance of the portal. Canada has enrolled 30+ men in exercise programs and will soon add 4 sites and launch their portal. The UK has evaluated assessment protocols in 2 sites and will soon add a 3rd site and implement the pharmacy-based program. The U.S. is building the portal and supportive tools and will begin a trial in Fall 2016. Conclusions: Each TrueNTH program shares common goals to improve lifestyle practices among PCS. Common metrics across initiatives will allow for a global comparison of implementation approaches and assessment of impact at a population level. TrueNTH will utilize this initiative to create a lifestyle survivorship program that improves the lives of PCS worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.539
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207