MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460318076 · doi:10.1097/spc.0000000000000230

Whose value is it anyway? Clinical ethics in palliative and supportive care

2016· editorial· en· W2460318076 on OpenAlexaffabout
Irene Ying, Sally Bean

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care · 2016
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of TorontoHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioethicsPalliative careMedicineHealth centreResearch centreLibrary sciencePublic healthHealth careFamily medicineNursingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

aSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto; University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics bSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics; Dalla Lana School of Public Health; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation; School of Graduate Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Correspondence to Irene Ying, MD MHSc CCFP(PC), 2075 Bayview Ave, H336, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada. Tel: +1 416 480 6100; e-mail: [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.014
Scholarly communication0.0120.010
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0300.038
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.337
GPT teacher head0.627
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Supportive and Palliative CareSame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207