MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460390767

Indigenous and minority peoples and cultural safety: the role of Nursing Praxis.

2014· editorial· en· W2460390767 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Denise Wlson

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2014
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Competency in Health Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPraxisCultural safetyIndigenousNursingNursing researchHealth equitySociologyHealth carePolitical sciencePublic relationsMedicinePublic healthLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Undeniably, Nursing Praxis has played an important role in promoting nursing research addressing the nexus between nurses' practice and the people with whom they work. The journal began as a place for nurses to exchange ideas, and to contemplate what nursing is about, and envision its future directions (Perry, 1985). The current strategic focus for Nursing Praxis is cultural safety, indigenous health, and vulnerable populations. Since the first publication of Nursing Praxis in November 1985, 31% of all the articles pertain to cultural safety (25%), indigenous (15%), and vulnerable (60%) populations. Dissemination and translation of research is essential to assist practitioners, funders, planners, and policy makers in their roles. It is the what? question that we should ask when reviewing research outcomes. Moreover, this crystallises the need for interpretations of research findings with Indigenous, minority and vulnerable groups to also be critically informed by concepts such as social justice, human rights, equity, and intersectionality.Nursing Praxis is recognised nationally and internationally as a place where authors can pubish research or discursive papers related to cultural safety, indigenous health, and vulnerable populations. For me, the need and importance for nurses and other health professionals to disseminate research and ignite debate was highlighted at conferences I attended last year (that is, the International Academy of Nurse Editors Conference (held in Cork, Ireland) and the Critical Perspectives in Nursing and Health Care Conference (held in Vancouver, Canada)). That Nursing Praxis has a place in the world was confirmed by the responses to a presentation at last year's International Academy of Nurse Editors conference in Cork, Ireland, about our journal and what we were doing. With the update of our website, we have been able to take advantage of the analytic tools to see that approximately half of those visiting the Nursing Praxis website are international visitors, predominately from North America.The nexus between people's culture and health is complex, yet its importance for nurses and health providers will undeniably grow with the increasing multiplicity, diversity, and complexity of ethnic and cultural groups within many communities. In addition to Indigenous peoples and those with settler ancestry, increasing and diverse migratory patterns, particularly the mix of new migrants, those who have lived in a country for two or more generations, intermarriage, and the recognition of the cultural needs of nonethnic groups such as those with disabilities makes this an important area in which to share ideas, research findings, and to debate their various aspects in relation to health and wellbeing. The tenet that culture is an important factor in the health and wellbeing of people, their whanau/families, and communities has been long established within health and nursing (Leininger, 1970). Nonetheless, people belonging to Indigenous, minority, and vulnerable groups encounter cultural dissonance on a daily basis. This is so even with a backdrop where cultural safety and cultural competence feature as part of the New Zealand regulated health workforce practice requirements, and there are ongoing global and societal calls to address existing inequalities and inequities. Cultural responsiveness is an area that we constantly grapple with as a profession, generally with universal approaches to nursing and health service delivery being the default position. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCultural Competency in Health CareFrench-language works237,207