Linearly polarized Q-switched ceramic laser made with anisotropic nanostructured thin films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A polarizing laser mirror was made of an alternating sequence of low and high refractive index layers of titanium oxide using glancing angle deposition (GLAD). Large refractive index contrast and large birefringence, reaching 0.5 and 0.1, respectively, could be obtained from one single raw material by changing the deposition conditions. The laser mirror could withstand a train of 2.7 ns, single-mode pulses at 680 Hz, λ=1030 nm, and peak power density of 670 MW/cm2 when used as an output coupler of a passively Q-switched (Yb0.1Y0.9)3Al5O12 ceramic laser. The polarization extinction ratio was found to be better than 30 dB both in continuous-wave and pulsed regimes. These results indicate that polarizing laser mirrors made from nanostructured thin films with GLAD, in addition to being simple to fabricate, can withstand high pulse energy density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".