MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460447289 · doi:10.7202/1074458ar

Le syndrome de Diogène

2021· article· fr· W2460447289 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean-Jacques Naef

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicElder Abuse and Neglect
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le « syndrome de Diogène », entité médico-psychosociale, définie en Angleterre il y a trente ans, nous interpelle en tant que soignant dans la communauté. La prise en charge de ces patients dans le refus conduisait à des intervention en urgence, alors que leur état de santé s’était dégradé à un point tel que les deux tiers devaient décéder lors de leur admission en milieu hospitalier. Ces patients dans le refus, l’isolement et la crasse, vivant comme des « clochards » à domicile nous préoccupent. Que faire pour diminuer cette mortalité catastrophique ? Ces personnes avaient-elles leur capacité de discernement ? Leur esprit n’était-il pas suffisamment perturbé pour que nous puissions nous passer de leur avis pour intervenir sans leur consentement ? À l’aide de quelques situations, nous essaierons de montrer que l’esprit de ces personnes est bien vivant et qu’il est possible de maintenir ces personnes à domicile et de diminuer de façon radicale les taux de mortalité observés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicElder Abuse and NeglectFrench-language works237,207