MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460450645 · doi:10.1002/mabi.201600154

Synthesis of Polyester Dendritic Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications

2016· article· en· W2460450645 on OpenAlexafffund
Lukas P. Sadowski, Patricia E. Edem, John F. Valliant, Alex Adronov

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Bioscience · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolyesterPolymer scienceDendrimerChemistryNanotechnologyMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a well‐defined poly(2,2‐bis(hydroxymethyl)propanoic acid) dendrimer scaffold, a series of G1 to G3 dendrons is functionalized at the periphery with alkynes to enable “Click” functionalization via the copper‐catalyzed alkyne–azide cycloaddition (CuAAC). The resulting dendrons are further functionalized at the core with a dipicolylamine (DPA) moiety to enable radiolabeling with 99m Tc for molecular imaging applications. Efficient CuAAC coupling is achieved using an azide‐functionalized triethylene glycol monomethyl ether (TEG‐N 3 ). Removal of copper from the DPA ligand is successfully performed on G1 and G2 dendrimers prior to radiolabeling with 99m Tc. Radiolabeling of the G3 dendrimer is accomplished via transmetallation of the [CuDPA] 2+ ligand with 99m Tc, further demonstrating the feasibility of the synthetic strategies in the preparation of dendritic imaging agents. Subsequent attachment of an acyloxymethyl ketone (AOMK) derivative for targeting of cathepsin B is also explored. Despite demonstrating the ability to ligate multiple AOMK ligands, the AOMK–dendrimer conjugates are not able to bind to cathepsin B, which may be attributed to steric hindrance at the dendrimer periphery. image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular BioscienceSame topicDendrimers and Hyperbranched PolymersFrench-language works237,207