MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460698182 · doi:10.1109/netsoft.2016.7502451

JANUS: Design of a software-defined infrastructure manager and its network control architecture

2016· article· en· W2460698182 on OpenAlexafffund
Byungchul Park, Thomas Lin, Hadi Bannazadeh, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVMwareCisco Systems
KeywordsTestbedComputer scienceScalabilityNetwork managementCloud computingSoftware-defined networkingComputer networkSoftware engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an integrated management architecture based on Software-Defined Infrastructure (SDI), an approach where an SDI Manager controls heterogeneous resources with a global view of the entire infrastructure. By exposing APIs on top of our SDI management system, we create a programmatic cloud environment where users can innovate, creating unique applications and services in a software-defined manner. In this paper we first provide an overview of the SDI manager, dubbed JANUS, that was developed and implemented in the SAVI testbed for application platforms. We focus on advanced software-defined network services that can be provided in this SDI environment. We present requirements that must be met by the SDI management system: Pro-active rule installation; Broadcast-free networking; VN creation and management; scalability and extensibility; and support for legacy networks. We describe the Network Control Module of the JANUS SDI Manager which was designed to meet the specified requirements. A key innovation that promotes scalability and performance is a FlowStore that tracks flows and cache rules in the SDN network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207