Analysis of Consequences and Ordinances of Revocation in Khula and Mubarat Divorce
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The divorce means dissolution of marriage permanent that has been done after performing divorce and since then is interrupted conjugal relationship between husband and wife, however, according to the type of divorce resulting from their work will be different. One of iqaat in Jurisprudence accepted by the man to see his wife at the time of iddah and also return women to we pay in order to possible to return the men to marriage in Khula and Mubarat divorce. In some cases challenges returning to philosophy of divorce and a kind of defeating the purpose will be done that the opportunity does not give the men. And thus the nature of divorce is irrevocable and complete separation between men and women is created. Given the importance of returning issue, this research examines the effects of works and judgments of return on Khula and Mubarat divorce. After reviewing, finally, it was concluded that there is not difference between return and its effect in Khula and Mubarat divorce and the only difference is in the nature of these two divorces. So it is necessary that this issue comprehensively reflected in the law books.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".