An overview of nickel mineralisation in Africa with emphasis on the Mesoproterozoic East African Nickel Belt (EANB)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nickel production in Africa takes place principally in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe, with much of the South African and Zimbabwean production being a by-product of platinum-group element mining in the Bushveld Complex and Great Dyke. Several large nickel deposits have been discovered elsewhere in Africa but until recently, their development has been hindered by political risk and limitations in energy and transport infrastructure. Most of the continent is significantly underexplored with respect to base metals, including the area covered by the East African Nickel Belt (EANB). The known nickel deposits of the EANB all occur in mafic-ultramafic intrusive rocks of the Mesoproterozoicage Kibaran igneous event. These intrusive bodies take the form of medium to large layered intrusions, small dynamic magma conduits (chonoliths and sills) and dyke swarms. Laterite deposits are developed over exposed dunite and peridotite lithologies in the basal sequence of larger layered intrusions, whereas nickel sulphide deposits are developed at the base of the small chonoliths. Geochronological and geochemical data suggests that all intrusions in the EANB formed in a single magmatic event (1350 to 1400 Ma) and were derived from a picritic parental magma, which was variably contaminated in mid to upper-crustal staging chambers by metasedimentary rocks. As a result, nickel sulphide mineralisation was formed in all of the intrusions, but in most, the grades and tenors are too low to be considered economic in the foreseeable future. In the 1970s, government-led regional surveys identified a large nickel laterite deposit at Musongati in Burundi and a nickel sulphide deposit at Kabanga in the northwest of Tanzania. These deposits have subsequently been explored and delineated by mining companies, but they remain undeveloped due to their distance to the coast and a lack of transport and energy infrastructure. The Kabanga sulphide deposit now comprises a total mineral resource of 58 million tonnes grading 2.6% nickel. The Musongati laterite deposit comprises an overall resource of 122 million tonnes with a grade of 1.4% nickel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".