MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460948694 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-229-9:299

Pulsed-Field and Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis of Long Arrays of Tandemly Repeated DNA: Analysis of Human Centromeric Alpha Satellite

2003· article· en· W2460948694 on OpenAlexaff
Peter E. Warburton, Rachel Wevrick, Melanie M. Mahtani, Huntington F. Willard

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsAmgen (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsSatellite DNAGenomeRepeated sequenceDNABiologyGeneticsPulsed-field gel electrophoresisHuman genomegenomic DNAGel electrophoresisGenomic organizationComputational biologyGeneGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complex genomes are characterized by large amounts of tandemly repeated DNA that can comprise up to several percent of the genome in some organisms (1,2). The analysis of the organization of this type of DNA presents certain challenges owing to its repetitive nature, genomic distribution, and large array size. The availability of the large-scale resolution of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (3,4) has allowed an increased understanding of the genomic organization of long arrays of tandemly repeated DNA, including their overall size and internal polymorphic variation. Such analyses are useful for long-range physical mapping of the large blocks of repetitive DNA characteristic of complex genomes and allow genetic information to be obtained for these loci. Although described here for human centromerit alpha satellite DNA, these techniques are also applicable to other repetitive and multicopy DNA families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207