A study of the heat transfer characteristics of novel Ni‐foam structured catalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Highly exothermic reactions require catalyst beds with good heat transfer characteristics. Novel Ni‐foam structured catalysts have significant heat transfer efficiency compared with traditional packed beds, which is very suitable for the highly exothermic methanation reaction. The present work reports an experimental study of steady‐state heat transfer behaviour of a gas flowing through a fixed bed packed with Ni‐foam structured catalyst under various operation conditions. Experiments were carried out in a dedicated tubular reactor with inlet air temperature ranging from 160 to 200 °C, heating pipe temperature inside the fixed bed ranging from 400 to 500 °C, and air flow rate ranging from 4.0 to 6.0 Nm 3 /h. Effective radial conductivity ( λ er ) and wall heat transfer coefficient ( α w ) were derived based on the steady‐state measurements and the two‐dimensional pseudo‐homogeneous heat transfer model. The estimated values of λ er and α w were between 2.17 and 3.34 W/m · K and 170 to 250 W/m 2 · K respectively. Heat transfer properties of Ni‐foam structured catalyst are prominent compared with conventional packed bed. From the results it was found that the metal matrix and porous structure of the catalyst enhanced heat transfer. We anticipate that our research will open a new opportunity for design of new‐generation SNG process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".