MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2461207004 · doi:10.14288/1.0103138

Potential market of Parallel Strand Lumber (PSL) and Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) in Indonesia

2013· article· en· W2461207004 on OpenAlex
Andre M Iskandar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminated veneer lumberVeneerStructural engineeringEngineeringPulp and paper industryComposite materialMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this thesis is to explore the market potential of the two engineered-wood products, i.e., the Parallel Strand Lumber (PSL) and Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) in Indonesia. An introduction to the wood products processing sector, with a definition of wood products will be laid out. A detailed product description of the two main wood products in question will then be identified. This research will show the demand and supply of PSL and LVL as well as its application in the world, such as Australia, the United States and other countries. Indonesia will be the major topic of this research. A small introduction of the country and its connection to wood industry will be stated. To conclude, a distinct analysis will be drawn in relation to what the market potential of PSL and LVL is in Indonesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it