Influence of Grit Blasting on the Interface Roughness and Adhesion Strength of Cold Sprayed Copper Coatings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Surface preparation is very important for reliable adhesive bonding of cold sprayed coatings to the substrate. In this work, the grit blasting of low-carbon A516 steel substrates with Al2O3 particles was studied and the roughness parameters Ra and Rt of the grit blasted surfaces were then measured. The influence of alumina grit size on the roughening of the A516 steel substrate, and the resulting effect on the roughness of the Cu coating – steel interface were studied. The results showed that variations of the grit blast size had significantly affected the resultant surface roughness of the substrate. The adhesive strength of the formed copper coatings on A516 steel substrates depends on the surface roughness and hardness of the base material. The adhesive strength about 110-200MPa was achieved. The specific features of the Cu coating-A516 steel interface topography were examined and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it