MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SNR Estimation for FM-DCSK System over Multipath Rayleigh Fading Channels

2016· article· en· W2461348034 on OpenAlexafffund
Guofa Cai, Lin Wang, Long Kong, Georges Kaddoum

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRayleigh fadingEstimatorMultipath propagationAlgorithmComputer scienceFadingSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Estimation theoryStatisticsMathematicsTelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we deal with the problem of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) parameter for frequency modulated differential chaos shift key (FM-DCSK) system over multipath Rayleigh fading channels. The ML estimators are derived for various scenarios including data-aided (DA), non-data aided (NDA) and joint DA-NDA estimation by using both the data and pilot symbols. For comparison purposes, the Cramér- Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) for the SNR estimators are derived. The performance of the estimators is evaluated by simulations and comparing with CRLBs in terms of the mean-square-error. Simulated results show that for a large spreading factor the proposed scheme performs well over a wide SNR range in comparisons with CRLBs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207