Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conrad Black has written the liveliest and most comprehensive popular biography of Franklin D. Roosevelt to date. True, Black, the Canadian-born media executive and member of the British House of Lords, breaks no new ground, factually or analytically. His main conclusions—fdr was a great president, the New Deal saved capitalism from the capitalists, Roosevelt's war leadership saved the world—are conventional, even mundane. His is very much an old-fashioned life and times, with fdr as all-purpose hero. But Black's way of arriving at his judgments is hardly conventional. He has intelligently mined a multitude of published primary and secondary works. Even when he covers familiar ground, his provocative, often idiosyncratic, assessments of individuals and events command attention. The best parts of this long book are, first, Black's shrewd account of fdr's early life and ascent to the presidency and, second, Black's real passion, World War II, which occupies more than half of the narrative. Black is most successful at the personal level, deftly shifting between fdr's private and public lives, integrating the two more effectively than any previous biographer has done. He is brilliant at depicting the multiplicity of relationships in Roosevelt's life—with aides such as Louis Howe, Harry Hopkins, Marguerite LeHand, and Henry Morgenthau; with political friends and foes such as Al Smith, Wendell Willkie, and Joseph P. Kennedy; and with the wartime leaders and military commanders Winston Churchill, Joseph Stalin, Charles de Gaulle, George C. Marshall, and Douglas MacArthur (who, Black speculates, might have made a better commander of Allied forces in Europe than the competent but unimaginative Dwight D. Eisenhower). On the most important relationship in fdr's life, Black provides a more balanced account of the give-and-take between Eleanor and Franklin than Eleanor's biographers Joseph Lash or Blanche Wiesen Cook, but his occasional depiction of Eleanor as a nagging do-gooder borders on caricature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.316 | 0.222 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".