MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2461602460 · doi:10.1159/000457694

Mouse Placental Receptor for Basic Somatomedin followingMaternal Ethanol Administration

2017· article· en· W2461602460 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Kennedy, S.K. Mukerji, B. Bhaumick

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestationEndocrinologyInternal medicineReceptorPlacentaEthanolBiologyPregnancySomatomedinRatónFetusMedicineBiochemistryGrowth factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously reported a reduction in the basic somatomedin (B-SM) binding activity of day-15 mouse placental membranes following 3 days of acute maternal ethanol administration. In the present experiments, we have investigated the effects of acute maternal ethanol administration early in gestation on the subsequent development of the placental B-SM receptor, and its relationship to alcohol-related embryofetal growth deficits. Following administration of aqueous ethanol (0.0, 3.6, 5.5 or 7.1 ml/kg) by gavage on days 7, 8 and 9 of gestation, there was no evidence of reproductive impairment in alcohol-treated dams, but there was a significant reduction in day-15 embryonic body weight. Crown-rump length was unaffected. There was no treatment-related difference in the percentage specific binding of [125I]-B-SM by day-15 placental membranes, or in maternal serum B-SM concentrations. These observations suggest that embryofetal growth restriction following maternal ethanol administration is not mediated directly by peripheral unresponsiveness of the B-SM receptor, at least when the exposure occurs early in or prior to placental receptor ontogeny.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental Pharmacology and TherapeuticsSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207